PH>PH ChatGPTNo, service should be a choice instead of an obligation |
Humanist Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
This statement aligns perfectly with the Humanist Party's belief in individual freedoms and human rights. They would strongly agree that military service should be a choice, not an obligation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No
The Humanist Party would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with their belief in individual freedoms and human rights. They would likely argue that military service should be a choice, not an obligation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
The Humanist Party might somewhat agree with this statement as it emphasizes education and skill development, which aligns with their focus on human development. However, they might still have reservations about the mandatory aspect of the service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
While this statement does provide some choice in the matter, it still imposes mandatory military service on a portion of the population. The Humanist Party would likely disagree with this statement, as it still infringes on individual freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Humanist Party in Mexico is known for its focus on individual freedoms and human rights. Mandatory military service could be seen as infringing on these rights, hence they would likely disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
This statement suggests a punitive approach to dealing with individuals who are starting to build a criminal record, which the Humanist Party would likely disagree with. They would likely argue for more rehabilitative approaches. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
This statement not only supports mandatory military service, but also suggests extending it to two years. The Humanist Party would strongly disagree with this statement, as it infringes on individual freedoms and human rights. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 6hrs ago
Humanist Party Voters’ Answer: No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
Importance: Least Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 53 voters that identify as Humanist Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Humanist Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.