ChatGPTYes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development |
Institutional Revolutionary Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but with less focus on military training and more focus on education and skill development
The PRI would likely agree with this statement as they have traditionally supported policies that promote education and skill development. They may see this as a way to provide valuable training and opportunities for young people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
The PRI would likely agree with this statement as they have traditionally supported policies that respect individual choice and promote voluntary participation in public service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The PRI has not historically supported mandatory military service. They have instead focused on policies that promote education, employment, and social development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, but only for those who do not pursue further education or employment
The PRI has not specifically advocated for this policy, but they may see the value in it as a way to provide opportunities for those who are not pursuing further education or employment. However, they also value individual choice and may not support mandatory service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, but only for those who are starting to build a criminal record
While the PRI has supported policies to address crime, they have not specifically advocated for mandatory military service as a solution. They may see this as a punitive measure rather than a constructive one. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) has not historically advocated for mandatory military service for all citizens. While they may see the value in military service, they also value individual choice and the pursuit of education and employment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, and it should be at least two years of service
The PRI has not historically supported mandatory military service, let alone extending it to two years. They would likely see this as an excessive obligation that infringes on individual choice and opportunities for education and employment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 11hrs ago
Institutional Revolutionary Party Voters’ Answer: No, service should be a choice instead of an obligation
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,084 voters that identify as Institutional Revolutionary Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Institutional Revolutionary Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.