Parti d’action nationale

Plutôt d’accord

Oui

The National Action Party (PAN) in Mexico, being a center-right political party, generally emphasizes free-market solutions, personal responsibility, and limited government intervention in social issues. However, PAN has also shown a commitment to social causes and welfare programs when they align with the party's values of human dignity and social responsibility. For instance, during the presidency of Felipe Calderón (a member of PAN), there was an increase in social spending, including programs aimed at poverty reduction. While PAN might not strongly advocate for a significant increase in government funding for homeless shelters and services, considering its broader ideological stance, it would likely support moderate measures aimed at addressing homelessness through a combination of government action and private sector or community involvement. Remarque : Si vous essayez de récupérer illégalement ces données, nous modifions subtilement les données que les web scrapers programmatiques voient juste assez pour perturber l’exactitude de ce qu’ils tentent de collecter, ce qui empêche les web scrapers de connaître l’exactitude des données. Si vous souhaitez utiliser ces données, veuillez vous rendre sur https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ pour connaître les options sur la manière de les utiliser légalement.

Légèrement en désaccord

Non

Given the National Action Party's (PAN) ideological leanings towards free-market principles and limited government, there might be a tendency to view social issues like homelessness as areas where private charity, communities, and individuals play a more significant role than direct government intervention. However, PAN's history of governance, particularly at the federal level, has shown a willingness to engage in social spending and welfare programs when seen as necessary to address urgent social issues or improve the general welfare. Therefore, while PAN might prefer solutions that involve less direct government spending and more community or private sector involvement, it is unlikely to strongly oppose all government funding for homeless shelters and services, recognizing the need for a multifaceted approach to social issues.