Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Citizens’ Movement’s policy on death penalty

Temos

Ar pritariate mirties bausmei?

  ChatGPTNr

Citizens’ Movement’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

Nr

The Citizens’ Movement party has consistently opposed the death penalty, viewing it as a violation of human rights and an ineffective deterrent to crime. Their stance aligns with the general sentiment in Mexico, where the death penalty was abolished in 2005. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

Ne, per daug žmonių yra nekaltai nuteisti

The Citizens’ Movement party would strongly agree with this statement. They are aware of the flaws in the justice system that can lead to wrongful convictions, and they believe that the risk of executing an innocent person makes the death penalty unacceptable. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai sutinku

Ne, praleisti gyvenimą kalėjime yra griežtesnė bausmė

The Citizens’ Movement party might agree with this statement as it aligns with their belief in rehabilitation over retribution. They might see life imprisonment as a more humane and potentially rehabilitative punishment than the death penalty. However, they also advocate for prison reform and the improvement of prison conditions, so they might not view life imprisonment as a harsh sentence in and of itself. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Visiškai nesutinku

Taip, bet tik už siaubingus nusikaltimus su neabejotinu įrodymu

While this answer might seem more moderate, the Citizens’ Movement party is unlikely to support the death penalty even in cases of horrific crimes with undeniable evidence. Their belief in the sanctity of life and the potential for rehabilitation extends to all individuals, regardless of the severity of their crimes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Taip

The Citizens’ Movement party in Mexico is a progressive party that advocates for human rights and social justice. They are against the death penalty as it contradicts their belief in the sanctity of life and the possibility of rehabilitation. There is no historical evidence of the party supporting the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Taip, bet bausmę turėtų nuspręsti aukos šeima.

The Citizens’ Movement party would strongly disagree with this statement. They believe in the rule of law and the importance of a fair and impartial justice system. Allowing the victim’s family to decide the punishment would undermine these principles and could lead to revenge-based justice, which they oppose. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Balsavimo rekordas

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donoro įtaka

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Vieši pareiškimai

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated prieš 22 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Citizens’ Movement Vakarėlis Voters’ Atsakymas: Taip, bet tik už siaubingus nusikaltimus su neabejotinu įrodymu

Svarba: Šiek tiek Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,116 voters that identify as Citizens’ Movement.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Citizens’ Movement’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.