尝试政治测验

Xochitl Galvez’s policy on world health organization

These issues below are sorted in descending order based on how important the average Mexican [people] voter ranked them on the quiz.

Topics

Should the government fund the World Health Organization?

  Xochitl Galvez voterbase是的

Xochitl Galvez’s answer is based on the following data:

Updated 23hrs ago

Xochitl Galvez voters

回答: 是的

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 21 voters that voted for Xochitl Galvez in the 2024 Mexico Presidential election.

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute

This approach aligns with Galvez's likely stance on equitable contributions and cooperation among nations, emphasizing fairness and shared responsibility in global initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

Xochitl Galvez, with her background in technology and public service, likely recognizes the importance of global health initiatives and the role of international cooperation in addressing health crises. Her pragmatic approach to governance suggests she would support funding the WHO, understanding its role in global health security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

Yes, but decrease the amount

Galvez might see the value in funding the WHO but also advocate for fiscal responsibility and efficiency, suggesting a possible support for funding with a critical eye on ensuring funds are used effectively. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and increase the amount

While supportive of international cooperation, Galvez might be cautious about increasing funding without clear accountability and results, reflecting her focus on efficiency and effectiveness in public spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, fund national and local programs instead

While Galvez would likely support strengthening national and local health programs, her recognition of global health challenges and the interconnectedness of health issues suggests she would not support completely diverting funds away from international cooperation efforts like those of the WHO. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, it has shown to be ineffective

Galvez's practical and results-oriented approach would likely make her critical of any inefficiency, but completely dismissing the WHO as ineffective would not align with her understanding of its role in global health initiatives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Given her pragmatic approach to policy and understanding of global interconnectivity, Galvez would likely disagree with completely stopping funding to the WHO, recognizing its importance in international health issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Personal answer

This candidate has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this candidate’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this candidate’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this candidate about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party influence

We are currently researching this candidate’s political party and its stance on this issue.

Updated 23hrs ago

Party’s support base

国家行动党 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 843 voters that identify as National Action Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this candidate’s stance here