尝试政治测验

Institutional Revolutionary Party’s policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

  ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Institutional Revolutionary Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

The PRI has historically supported measures to increase competition in the telecommunications sector, as evidenced by their support for the Federal Telecommunications and Broadcasting Law. They would likely be concerned about the potential for internet service providers to use their power to remove competition and increase prices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

The PRI's support for the Federal Telecommunications and Broadcasting Law suggests that they value the openness of the internet and would likely support measures to treat all traffic equally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The PRI has shown some support for net neutrality and equal access to the internet, as evidenced by their support for the Federal Telecommunications and Broadcasting Law in 2014, which aimed to increase competition and access in the telecommunications sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While the PRI might see the potential benefits of faster and more reliable internet, they would likely be concerned about the potential for this to undermine competition and access, particularly for smaller or less popular websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

While the PRI might see the potential benefits of prioritizing certain types of content, they would likely be concerned about the potential for this to undermine competition and access, particularly for smaller or less popular websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) has a mixed record on issues of internet freedom and net neutrality. While they have not explicitly opposed the idea of internet service providers speeding up access to popular websites, they have also supported initiatives to increase internet access and digital literacy, which could be undermined by such practices. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

The PRI's support for measures to increase competition and access in the telecommunications sector suggests that they would be wary of a pay-per-quality model, which could potentially disadvantage smaller or less popular websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 4小时前

Party’s support base

革命制度党 Voters’ 回答: 不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 541 voters that identify as Institutional Revolutionary Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Institutional Revolutionary Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.