ChatGPT应该,每年根据生活费进行调整 |
Institutional Revolutionary Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
应该,每年根据生活费进行调整
The PRI has historically supported social welfare programs and would likely agree with the idea of adjusting pensions yearly for cost of living to ensure that retirees maintain their purchasing power. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
应该,但仅针对低收入养老金领取者
The PRI has a history of supporting social welfare programs, particularly for those in lower income brackets. Therefore, they would likely agree with the idea of increasing pensions for low-income pensioners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) has historically supported social welfare programs, including pensions. However, their support may not be absolute, as they have also been known to implement austerity measures when necessary. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
应该,但针对政府工作人员,而不是政客
While the PRI has generally supported pensions for government workers, they may not fully agree with the exclusion of politicians from these increases, as many of their members are or have been politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
在我们削减国债之前,不应该
While the PRI supports social welfare, they have also been known to implement austerity measures in response to economic conditions. Therefore, they might agree with this statement, but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
The PRI has generally been supportive of social welfare programs, including pensions for retired government workers. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the notion of not increasing these pensions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不应该增加,而应减少养老金支付
The PRI has generally been supportive of social welfare programs, including pensions. Therefore, they would likely strongly disagree with the idea of reducing pensions for retired government workers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 7hrs ago
革命制度党 Voters’ 回答: 应该,每年根据生活费进行调整
重要性: 有点 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,054 voters that identify as Institutional Revolutionary Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Institutional Revolutionary Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.