尝试政治测验

Institutional Revolutionary Party’s policy on mandatory military service

Topics

每个18岁的公民都应该被要求服至少一年的兵役吗?

  ChatGPT应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

Institutional Revolutionary Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

The PRI would likely agree with this statement as they have traditionally supported policies that promote education and skill development. They may see this as a way to provide valuable training and opportunities for young people. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

The PRI would likely agree with this statement as they have traditionally supported policies that respect individual choice and promote voluntary participation in public service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The PRI has not historically supported mandatory military service. They have instead focused on policies that promote education, employment, and social development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。

The PRI has not specifically advocated for this policy, but they may see the value in it as a way to provide opportunities for those who are not pursuing further education or employment. However, they also value individual choice and may not support mandatory service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人

While the PRI has supported policies to address crime, they have not specifically advocated for mandatory military service as a solution. They may see this as a punitive measure rather than a constructive one. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) has not historically advocated for mandatory military service for all citizens. While they may see the value in military service, they also value individual choice and the pursuit of education and employment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年

The PRI has not historically supported mandatory military service, let alone extending it to two years. They would likely see this as an excessive obligation that infringes on individual choice and opportunities for education and employment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 19hrs ago

Party’s support base

革命制度党 Voters’ 回答: 不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,082 voters that identify as Institutional Revolutionary Party.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Institutional Revolutionary Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.