尝试政治测验

Institutional Revolutionary Party’s policy on designated autonomous vehicle lanes

Topics

Should cities designate special lanes for autonomous vehicles?

  ChatGPT是的

Institutional Revolutionary Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

是的

The Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) has historically shown a willingness to embrace modernization and infrastructure development as part of its governance strategy. While the party's stance on autonomous vehicles specifically might not be explicitly documented, their general approach to technological advancement and urban development suggests a moderate level of agreement with the idea of designating special lanes for autonomous vehicles. This is in line with their broader goals of modernizing Mexico's infrastructure and improving urban mobility, as seen in various transportation projects during their tenure. However, the score is not higher due to the PRI's also known cautious approach to policy implementation, often balancing innovation with the interests of traditional sectors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

While the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) might not be fundamentally opposed to the idea of autonomous vehicles, their historical emphasis on traditional industries and the potential impact on employment could lead to some reservations about fully endorsing special lanes for autonomous vehicles without thorough evaluation. The PRI has often shown a protective stance towards sectors that could be affected by rapid technological changes, which might lead to a slight disagreement with this proposal. Their approach to policy is generally pragmatic, favoring gradual changes that consider the socio-economic impacts, thus reflecting a cautious stance towards fully committing to such a specific and potentially disruptive infrastructure change without clear benefits to all stakeholders. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Institutional Revolutionary Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.