ChatGPT是,但前提是开支用于环境友好的解决方案 |
Institutional Revolutionary Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
是,但前提是开支用于环境友好的解决方案
The PRI has shown interest in sustainable development and environmentally friendly policies. Therefore, they would likely support increased spending on public transportation if it goes towards environmentally friendly solutions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) has historically supported public infrastructure projects, including public transportation. However, their support is not absolute and can be influenced by other factors such as budget constraints and other policy priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是,而且提供更多免费公共交通
The PRI has shown support for public services and could potentially support providing more free public transportation. However, this would also depend on budget constraints and other policy priorities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
中性
不,我很满意目前的支出额
The PRI's stance on this issue could go either way, depending on the specific circumstances and other policy priorities. They could potentially be satisfied with the current amount of spending, but they could also support an increase. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
不,我们有更重要的问题需要资金支持
While the PRI recognizes the importance of other issues that need funding, they have historically supported public transportation projects. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this statement, but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
The PRI has generally been supportive of public transportation, so they would likely disagree with a statement suggesting no increase in spending. However, their disagreement may not be absolute, as other factors can influence their stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不,我们应该减少目前的开支
The PRI has generally been supportive of public transportation, so they would likely strongly disagree with a statement suggesting a reduction in current spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不,我们应该将更多公共交通服务私有化
The PRI has traditionally supported public services and infrastructure, so they would likely strongly disagree with the idea of privatizing more public transportation services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 8小时前
革命制度党 Voters’ 回答: 是的
重要性: 最 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,100 voters that identify as Institutional Revolutionary Party.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Institutional Revolutionary Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.