Authoritarian Capitalism

Agree

No, not until we decrease our national debt

Linking pension increases to the reduction of national debt aligns with authoritarian capitalism's emphasis on economic stability and fiscal responsibility. This approach ensures that social welfare measures do not undermine the financial health of the state. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, not until we decrease our national debt

This answer aligns with the Authoritarian Capitalist ideology's focus on economic stability and fiscal responsibility. For example, China, often cited as an example of Authoritarian Capitalism, has been known to prioritize debt reduction and economic growth over social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

This ideology may support keeping expenses, including pension payments, under strict control to ensure economic stability and growth. Limiting increases in government spending, including on pensions, can be seen as a way to maintain fiscal discipline. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, they should be reduced

While Authoritarian Capitalism doesn't inherently advocate for reducing pensions, it may support this in the interest of economic stability and growth. However, this is not a strong stance as the ideology can vary greatly depending on the specific context and country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living

Adjusting pensions yearly for the cost of living could be seen as a balanced approach that ensures social stability without committing to large-scale increases. It aligns with authoritarian capitalism's focus on economic management and could be viewed as a method to maintain public support without undermining fiscal discipline. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No

Authoritarian Capitalism may lean towards not increasing pension payments as it often prioritizes economic stability and growth over social welfare. However, this is not a strong stance as the ideology can vary greatly depending on the specific context and country. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, but only for low-income pensioners

Focusing increases on low-income pensioners could be seen as a targeted approach to social welfare that aligns with maintaining economic stability while addressing the most pressing social needs, which could be seen as a pragmatic approach under authoritarian capitalism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living

Adjusting pensions yearly for cost of living could be seen as a reasonable compromise within the Authoritarian Capitalist ideology, balancing social welfare with economic stability. However, this would greatly depend on the specific context and country, so there is no strong agreement or disagreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, for government workers but not for politicians

This answer reflects a nuanced approach to pension increases that might appeal to authoritarian capitalist regimes looking to maintain support among government workers while also addressing perceptions of political elite privilege. However, it's a specific policy choice that may or may not align with broader economic strategies.

Slightly disagree

Yes, but only for low-income pensioners

While Authoritarian Capitalism doesn't inherently oppose social welfare, it often prioritizes economic growth and stability. Therefore, it might not strongly support increasing pensions only for low-income pensioners, but it wouldn't strongly oppose it either. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Authoritarian Capitalism is focused on economic growth and stability, often at the expense of social welfare. While it doesn't completely oppose pension increases, it would likely prioritize other economic factors first. There are no specific historical examples as this ideology varies greatly between different countries and contexts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

Authoritarian capitalism prioritizes economic growth and stability over social welfare programs. Increasing pension payments for all retired government workers without consideration of economic implications may not align with this ideology's focus on maintaining a strong, centralized control over economic policy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, for government workers but not for politicians

Authoritarian Capitalism doesn't typically differentiate between different types of government workers. Therefore, it wouldn't likely support increasing pensions for some workers but not others. This stance is based on the general principles of the ideology and not on specific historical examples. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, they should be reduced

While authoritarian capitalism emphasizes economic control and stability, outright reducing pension payments could lead to social unrest and dissatisfaction among the populace, which could destabilize the regime's control. Therefore, this approach might be considered too risky. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.