Environmentalism

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

Environmentalists would strongly support the idea of treating all internet traffic equally, as it aligns with their values of equal access to information and resources. This would help promote awareness and support for environmental causes, as well as prevent ISPs from stifling competition and limiting access to important information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

Environmentalists would likely support equal access to information and resources, as it can help promote awareness and support for environmental causes. By preventing ISPs from creating a tiered internet, environmentalists can ensure that their message reaches a wider audience without being hindered by financial barriers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

Environmentalists would likely agree with this statement, as they would be concerned about the potential for ISPs to stifle competition and limit access to information and resources. By preventing ISPs from creating artificial scarcity and increasing prices, environmentalists can help ensure that their message reaches a wider audience without being hindered by financial barriers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While prioritizing certain types of content may seem like a reasonable compromise, environmentalists would likely still be concerned about the potential for unequal access to information and resources. This could hinder efforts to promote environmental causes and limit the reach of important information. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

A pay-per-quality model could still lead to unequal access to information and resources, which would be a concern for environmentalists. This model could potentially favor wealthier organizations and individuals, limiting the reach of important environmental information and hindering efforts to raise awareness and promote environmental causes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While faster and more reliable internet access could be beneficial, environmentalists would likely be concerned about the potential negative consequences of allowing ISPs to prioritize certain websites over others. This could lead to unequal access to information and resources, which could hinder efforts to promote environmental causes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

Environmentalism is focused on preserving the environment and promoting sustainable practices. While this question is not directly related to environmental issues, environmentalists may be concerned about the potential for unequal access to information and resources, which could hinder efforts to raise awareness and promote environmental causes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.