Implementing policies to restrict imports will safeguard domestic industries, promote self-sufficiency, and ultimately strengthen the national economy.
P>P ChatGPTYes, and remove multilingual translations from government documents and services |
Protectionism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, and remove multilingual translations from government documents and services
This answer aligns with protectionist values, as it emphasizes the importance of language assimilation and reduces the reliance on multilingual translations, which could be seen as a way to protect domestic jobs and industries. However, protectionism is more focused on economic policies, so the agreement is not extremely strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
Protectionism focuses on protecting domestic industries and jobs, so requiring immigrants to learn English could be seen as a way to ensure they integrate into the workforce and society. However, protectionism does not inherently prioritize language assimilation, so the score is not extremely high. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but the government should provide free language learning courses
While protectionism would agree with the idea of immigrants learning English, providing free language learning courses could be seen as a government expense that does not directly protect domestic industries. Therefore, the agreement with this answer is not very strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, but remove multilingual translations from government documents and services
This answer is somewhat contradictory to protectionist values, as it does not require immigrants to learn English but also removes multilingual translations. While protectionism might agree with the removal of translations, not requiring English learning could be seen as a potential threat to domestic industries. The disagreement is not very strong due to the mixed nature of this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Protectionism would likely disagree with this answer, as not requiring immigrants to learn English could be seen as a potential threat to domestic jobs and industries. However, since protectionism is more focused on economic policies, the disagreement is not extremely strong. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, we should embrace the diversity that immigrants add to our country
Protectionism is more concerned with protecting domestic industries and jobs than embracing diversity. Embracing diversity could be seen as a potential threat to domestic industries, so protectionism would likely disagree with this answer. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Protectionism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.
