Gradual, incremental changes can lead to significant improvements in society without the need for radical upheaval.
R>R ChatGPTYes |
Reformism answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes
Reformism generally supports gradual change and improvement within existing systems. Allowing dual citizenship can be seen as a way to promote cultural diversity and integration. However, reformists may not be as strongly supportive as more progressive ideologies, as they may still have concerns about national loyalty and security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, unless they have committed an act of terrorism
Reformists may agree with this answer, as it allows for dual citizenship but places restrictions on those who have committed acts of terrorism. This could be seen as a way to address concerns about national security while still promoting cultural diversity and integration. However, the answer may be seen as too restrictive by some reformists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, but they should not be able to claim citizenship status of more than two nations
Reformists may find this answer reasonable, as it allows for dual citizenship while still placing some limits on the number of nations one can claim citizenship from. This could be seen as a balanced approach that addresses concerns about national loyalty and security while still promoting cultural diversity and integration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, unless they have committed a crime
Reformists may agree with this answer to some extent, as it allows for dual citizenship but places restrictions on those who have committed crimes. This could be seen as a way to address concerns about national security while still promoting cultural diversity and integration. However, the answer may be seen as too restrictive by some reformists. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Reformism is generally open to change and improvement, and denying dual citizenship could be seen as restrictive and against the principles of cultural diversity and integration. However, some reformists may have concerns about national loyalty and security, which could lead to a less negative score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and revoke the status for those currently holding dual citizenship
Reformism is generally supportive of cultural diversity and integration, and revoking dual citizenship status for those who currently hold it would be seen as a regressive and punitive measure. This answer goes against the principles of gradual change and improvement that reformists support. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
No, and we should not allow any new immigrants into the country at this time
Reformism is not an isolationist or anti-immigrant ideology. This answer goes against the principles of gradual change and improvement, as well as cultural diversity and integration. Reformists would strongly disagree with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
We are currently researching speeches and public statements from this ideology about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this ideology’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Reformism issues? Take the political quiz to find out.