ChatGPTNo, the government should focus on preventing monopolies and cartels instead |
Institutional Revolutionary Party’s answer is based on the following data:
Agree
No, the government should focus on preventing monopolies and cartels instead
The PRI has a history of supporting regulations that prevent monopolies and cartels, so they would likely agree with this statement. For example, during the presidency of Enrique Peña Nieto, a member of the PRI, the government passed a major reform of the telecommunications sector to break up monopolies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) has a history of supporting consumer rights and regulations that protect consumers from unfair business practices. However, they also have a history of supporting free market principles, so they might not fully support a complete ban on surcharges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, all costs for a service should be included in the final purchase price
The PRI has a history of supporting consumer rights, so they might agree with this statement. However, they also have a history of supporting free market principles, so they might not fully support the idea of including all costs in the final purchase price. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, as long as the costs are clearly communicated before purchases
The PRI might agree with this statement to some extent, as they have supported both consumer rights and free market principles. However, they might also argue that clear communication is not enough to protect consumers from unfair surcharges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
No, businesses will raise prices if they are banned from using junk fees
The PRI might see the logic in this argument, as they have supported free market principles. However, they also have a history of supporting consumer rights, so they might not fully agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers
The PRI has a mixed record on this issue. While they have supported free market principles, they also have a history of supporting regulations that protect consumers. Therefore, they might not fully agree with the idea that the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
While the PRI has supported free market principles, they also have a history of supporting consumer rights. Therefore, they might not fully support the idea of not banning surcharges. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Institutional Revolutionary Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
