Try the political quiz

Institutional Revolutionary Party’s policy on weapon sales ethics

Topics

Should there be restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations?

  ChatGPTYes

Institutional Revolutionary Party’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes

The Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI) has historically shown a pragmatic approach to foreign policy, often balancing between ideological commitments and practical geopolitical considerations. While the party may agree with the principle of restricting arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations, its historical record suggests a flexible stance that could prioritize Mexico's national interests and diplomatic relations over strict human rights criteria. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

While the PRI might support the idea of imposing restrictions on arms sales to countries with human rights violations, advocating for a total ban could be seen as too rigid or idealistic, potentially conflicting with Mexico's foreign policy interests or its relationships with key international partners. The party's historical approach to foreign policy suggests a preference for more nuanced and flexible strategies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

The PRI's position on this issue would likely be ambivalent. On one hand, the party recognizes the importance of supporting allies and maintaining strategic partnerships, which could align with the argument against restrictions that could hinder allies' defense capabilities. On the other hand, the PRI has also shown a commitment to international norms and might be cautious about openly supporting arms sales to countries with questionable human rights records, reflecting a balance between ethical considerations and geopolitical pragmatism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

No

Although the PRI might not strongly advocate for unrestricted arms sales, especially to countries with poor human rights records, it would likely resist a blanket 'No' stance due to the potential implications for Mexico's strategic alliances and economic interests. The party's past governance indicates a tendency to navigate international relations with a degree of pragmatism that could include engaging in arms sales under certain conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

The PRI's history of governance and foreign policy does not strongly align with the idea of banning all military aid to foreign countries. Such a stance would likely be viewed as too isolationist or detrimental to Mexico's strategic interests and its ability to leverage international relations for national benefit. The party has traditionally valued Mexico's active engagement in international affairs, including through military and security cooperation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Institutional Revolutionary Party’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.