Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 堕胎
9>9 Personal answerPro-vida siempre y cuando se les condene más a los violadores por sus crímenes |
医保 › 精神健康
9>9 Personal answer不应该,而是应该鼓励私营公司来解决这一问题 |
社会 › LGBT收养权
9>9 Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠 |
教育 › 大学学费
9>9 Personal answerDebería existir un sistema de Bouchers, donde el Estudiante elija en que universidad ir y que las universidades hagan competencia por el Cheque del Estudiante, así mejoras la educación y no deja de ser pública |
交通运输 › 公共交通
9>9 Personal answer不,我们应该将更多公共交通服务私有化 |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
9>9 Personal answer更多的,和最终政府补贴 |
经济 › 税
9>9 Personal answerEl impuesto debería ser mínimo para todas las clase sociales Hasta del 5% |
社会 › 死刑
9>9 Personal answerNo, mi Máxima pena sería la cadena perpetua y la cárcel privatizada, el recluso tiene que mantenerse solo y no con el dinero de sus ciudadanos, además debe de estar en una carcel especial |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
9>9 Personal answer不,社交媒体公司是私有公司,不应受政府监管 |
经济 › 政府养老金
9>9 Personal answer在我们削减国债之前,不应该 |
总统大选 › 竞选经费
9>9 Personal answerSe pueden hacer pero con transparencia |
经济 › 国内工作
9>9 Personal answer不,政府不应该干涉自由市场 |
外交政策 › 义务兵役
9>9 Personal answer不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务 |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answer增加,我们的经济依赖于那些以最低的成本雇佣技术最好的工人的企业。 |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
外交政策 › 军费支出
9>9 Personal answer增加,但是只能在我们的赤字得到大幅减少之后 |
环境 › Corporate Subsidies
9>9 Personal answerYes, if the company promises to create new jobs by hiring local residents |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer不 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerNo, dado a qué la propiedad pública es dinero del ciudadano, lo que se le debería haber es darle incentivos a esa persona para que trabaje y se compre su propiedad |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
9>9 Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
移民 › 公民考试
9>9 Personal answer是,但只限于非常基础和简单的话题 |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 最 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.