Try the political quiz
@ISIDEWITHQuestionsscienceStarted 11mos agoActive 1mo ago

Should the government regulate the use of CRISPR technology for human genetic modifications?

CRISPR is a powerful tool for editing genomes, allowing for precise modifications to DNA that allows scientists to better understand gene functions, model diseases more accurately, and develop innovative treatments. Proponents argue that regulation ensures safe and ethical use of the technology. Opponents argue that too much regulation could stifle innovation and scientific progress.

15 Replies

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...11mos11MO

Yes

 @ISIDEWITHDiscuss this answer...11mos11MO

No

 @B3HM945answered…1mo1MO

It should be regulated to not be forced on individuals.

 @B2YK4NTfrom Nevada  answered…2mos2MO

Yes but only for the benifet of babies, no genetically engineered babies

 @B246GNVIndependentfrom Pennsylvania  answered…4mos4MO

It depends on the context. It should probably be managed, to avoid designer babies, but I think that might be better left to an international group.

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Do you believe using science to extend human lifespan is more of an opportunity or a danger?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

How would you feel if someone edited their DNA to increase intelligence—fair game, or unfair advantage?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Could making genetic modifications increase social inequalities, or would it reduce them?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Would you personally use gene editing to eliminate a potential health issue in yourself or your family?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

What responsibility do you think we have to regulate how much technology like this is used in our society?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Can you name a potential positive or negative impact on nature and ecosystems if gene editing were widely applied outside humans?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

If you could change one genetic trait, what would it be and why?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Do you think altering human genes to eliminate disease crosses an ethical line, or is it just the next step in human evolution?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

How do you feel about the idea of using technology to control future generations' traits or abilities?

 @ISIDEWITHasked…7mos7MO

Should parents be allowed to use this kind of technology to select specific traits for their unborn children?

Demographics

Loading the political themes of users that engaged with this discussion

Loading data...

More conversations

Join in on more popular conversations.

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…8mos8MO

Trump agrees to debate Kamala Harris on Fox News

Former President Trump announced Friday night that he has agreed to Fox News' proposal for a debate against Vice President Kamala Harris.Trump said the debate would be held on Sept. 4 in Pennsylvania, although the location of the event has not yet been determined.The former president also noted that an ABC News debate previously scheduled against President Biden before he suspended his re-election campaign had been canceled, citing his lawsuit against that network and one of its hosts, George Stephanopoulos."I have agreed with FoxNews to debate Kamala Harris on Wednesday, September 4th," Trump wrote on his social media platform Truth Social. "The Debate was previously scheduled against Sleepy Joe Biden on ABC, but has been terminated in that Biden will no longer be a participant, and I am in litigation against ABC Network and George Slopadopoulos, thereby creating a conflict of interest."A campaign official for Vice President Kamala Harris accused Donald J. Trump on Saturday of scheming up a Sept. 4 debate on Fox News to avoid a debate scheduled for six days later on ABC News that Trump had committed to before President Biden dropped out of the race. “We’re happy to discuss further debates after the one both campaigns have already agreed to,” Michael Tyler, the Harris campaign’s communications director, said. “Mr. Anytime, anywhere, anyplace should have no problem with that unless he’s too scared to show up on the 10th.”

▲  1011 replies

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…6mos6MO

The Great Progressive Exodus: Inside the Left's War Against Harris

One of the central mysteries of this election has been to what extent the left will defect from Democrats, potentially costing Harris the election with votes for JILL STEIN or CORNEL WEST. Stein is far from concerned about that, NYT’s Matt Flegenheimer captures in a lengthy and dishy profile. For the first time ever, Democrats are launching an ad campaign against a third-party candidate (Stein) over the coming weeks. And even Stein’s own family and friends tell the Times they don’t support her and urged her not to run. Stein, whose “bid can feel precision-engineered to damage Ms. Harris with key subgroups,” pooh-poohs what she calls the “spoiler mythology” and places the blame squarely on Democrats.On college campuses, there are some signs that the left-wing protest movement has quieted from its peak when Biden was in the race — but even a small number of defections from Dems could prove pivotal in a close election.In East Lansing, Zack Stanton reports for POLITICO Magazine that Michigan State student activists furious about the Israel-Hamas war are torn between demanding more from Harris and stopping Trump. In Chapel Hill, WSJ’s Jimmy Vielkind and Cam Pollack find that many pro-Palestinian protesters at the University of North Carolina are nonetheless weighing other issues in their vote, especially abortion rights. But liberal groups are warning that some undecided voters of color still don’t feel like they know enough to be convinced for Harris — and may leave the top of the ticket blank, AP’s Ayanna Alexander reports.

▲  412 replies